Thursday, 19 November 2020 19:05

Richmond County Board of Elections to recount votes following petitions by Beasley, Legrand

Written by
Rate this item
(0 votes)

ROCKINGHAM — The Richmond County Board of Elections will have two recount matters to take up next week.


Richmond is one of 90 counties listed in an election protest filed by N.C. Supreme Court Chief Justice Cheri Beasley, according to Elections Director Connie Kelly.

(See the protest attached at the bottom of this story.)

“We have one voter they questioned that voted provisionally,” Kelly said in an email Thursday afternoon.

According to the N.C. State Board of Elections, Republican Paul Newby leads Beasley by 409 votes after all counties certified their results.

“Only the Supreme Court contest is eligible for a statewide recount, so no other statewide contests will be recounted,” spokesman Pat Gannon said in a press release.

In the release, the SBOE offered the following facts about the state’s recount process:

  • Recounts are a time-intensive, labor-intensive process. While some counties, such as Beaufort County, expect to complete their recounts in one day, larger counties with more ballots to count, such as Wake County, may take five or six days. In the 2020 general election, nearly 5.4 million voters cast ballots in the Supreme Court race, all on paper ballots. All 100 counties will use bipartisan teams to put every ballot through a tabulator, counting that contest only.
  • Several counties, including Guilford and Mecklenburg, are conducting paper ballot recounts for the first time, after recently switching voting systems. County boards of elections must arrange for two-person, bipartisan counting teams for each tabulator used in the recount. This ensures that both candidates’ political parties are represented at every step. For county-by-county recount schedules, go here: https://www.ncsbe.gov/2020-statewide-recount-meetings 
  • Small variances are expected between the canvassed results and the recount results. In a 2016 statewide recount in the state auditor’s race, Chuck Stuber trailed Beth Wood by about 6,000 votes before the recount. After the recount, Wood won by about 6,050 votes out of more than 4.5 million cast in that election. 
  • Because ballots are scanned again through the tabulator, which may be a different tabulator, partial or stray marks on the ballot may be counted differently the second time. This may result in counts that are marginally different from the initial count, by roughly a couple votes per 100,000 ballots cast.
  • Some counties are using high-speed tabulators to expedite their recounts, which also may result in slight variances from the results from the smaller precinct tabulators that first counted the ballots.
  • The 100 counties bear the cost of the recount. Pursuant to state law, the county boards of elections across North Carolina pay the bills for the recount. Costs will vary by the county’s size and the number of ballots to be recounted. In Greene County, with fewer than 9,000 ballots to recount, labor costs will be $400 to $600. The cost for Wake County, which has about 635,000 ballots to recount, will be an estimated $110,000. More than 100 people will work on Wake’s recount.
  • What are the possible next steps for the candidates? State law provides that if the initial recount is not hand-to-eye, which this is not, and does not reverse the results, that Beasley may demand a hand-to-eye recount in a sample of precincts. If the recount reversed the results, Newby would have the same right to ask for a hand-to-eye recount in a sample of precincts. The sample would be all ballots in 3 percent of the precincts and early voting sites in that county, chosen at random.
  • If results of the hand-to-eye recount differ from the previous results within those precincts to the extent that extrapolating the amount of the change to the entire jurisdiction (based on the proportion of ballots recounted to the total votes cast for that office) would result in the reversing of the results, then the State Board of Elections would order a hand-to-eye recount of all ballots statewide. The counties would bear the costs.
  • Recount results are official results. The results of the recount will be considered the official results for the Supreme Court Chief Justice contest.

The Richmond County Board of Elections will meet at 8:30 a.m. on Nov. 23 to hold a preliminary hearing on the matter, Kelly said.

Following the hearing, at 9 a.m., the board will conduct a recount in that race, as well as in the race for the third seat on the Richmond County Board of Commissioners between Republican Andy Grooms and Democrat Michael Legrand.

Legrand filed for a recount on Monday, after the final tally showed only 84 votes separating the two.

Grooms told the RO after the story was published that he didn’t blame Legrand for asking for a recount, adding that there was a “lot of work put in to come down to less than 100 votes.”

Members of the public can listen to the proceedings:

By Phone

1-415-655-0001

Meeting number (access code): 172 466 8723

Meeting password: 7S72Bk63iTp

Join from a video system or application

Dial This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

You can also dial 173.243.2.68 and enter your meeting number.

Join using Microsoft Lync or Microsoft Skype for Business

Dial This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.