In North Carolina, the political label “conservative” is more popular than the terms “liberal” or “progressive.” In the most recent John Locke Foundation poll, for example, 46% of likely voters described themselves as conservatives, with 25% picking the liberal label and the rest either “moderate” or nothing at all. If we broaden out to include all North Carolinians, not just those who reliably vote, the gap shrinks a bit. But conservatives still form a plurality — and they significantly outnumber liberals.
These are just stated preferences, though. They’re political brands, if you will. They aren’t definitions.
What is conservatism? Ask two self-identified conservatives and the two answers you get will never be identical. Over the past few years, in particular, the rise of populism on the American right has provoked a robust debate about the future of the movement. Should conservatives abandon their past commitments to free enterprise, balanced budgets, limited government, and local autonomy? Many self-styled “National Conservatives” say yes.
I say no. And I’m in good company. On July 13, more than eighty leaders from across the conservative movement — scholars, journalists, organizers, litigators, campaign veterans, and former public officials — released a statement declaring themselves Freedom Conservatives. “Authoritarianism is on the rise both at home and abroad,” they stated. “More and more people on the left and right reject the distinctive creed that made America great: that individual liberty is essential to the moral and physical strength of the nation.”
In the Freedom Conservatism Statement of Principles, the signatories of July 13 affirmed such propositions as:
I am honored to be among the signatories, who represent a wide variety of backgrounds, professions, leadership roles, and home states. We FreeCons don’t necessarily agree on every policy issue or priority. What we have in common, however, are a firm commitment to America’s founding principles and a passionate belief that political movements defined primarily by what they’re against instead of what they’re for are unlikely to build and sustain a successful governing coalition.
You can read our statement in full at FreedomConservatism.org. Now, just to be clear: we describe ourselves as FreeCons not because freedom is our sole interest but because without it, our other fundamental values and institutions will prove impossible to sustain. Only a free America can be a great America.
-30-
John Hood is a John Locke Foundation board member. His latest books, Mountain Folk and Forest Folk, combine epic fantasy with early American history (FolkloreCycle.com).